Saturday, October 22, 2011

Lacking an Attorney, Confirming Bodily Injury is Not Easy

Many times, in the minutes immediately after a traffic accident sufferers feel little or no pain. It isn't really until the next day when the trauma to their muscles and bones starts to become obvious with respect to pain.

It is not unusual for accident victims to shun medical care immediately following a crash and then appear at the hospital emergency room the following morning.

Even those who were raced to the hospital after a car accident might have trouble proving that their pain is the direct result of the accident, particularly if there are no outward obvious indications of bodily injury. Despite a physician’s ruling that the muscle has been injured, for example, it can be tough to prove the extent of the injury. Additionally, since each person’s limit for pain is different proving damages has a incapacitating affect can be challenging.

Lots of insurance providers and defendants in accidents will attempt to show that an injury was present ahead of the accident and, especially if your physician declares the accident exacerbated by an earlier injury, they will attempt to show their client isn't responsible for the victim’s pain. A hidden bodily injury, common in accidents, can often be difficult to prove without adequate medical treatment and representation by an accident attorney in Oregon.

It can become difficult if the wounded party refused immediate medical treatment with the defense generally claiming the anguish wasn’t bad enough until the victim realized they are often able to get paid for their injuries. Whiplash for example, is one of the most common bodily injuries that offer no physical proof, and is the most often disputed by defendants.

Following a car accident, even the slightest discomfort must be examined not only to provide proof of a bodily injury, and also to ascertain the extent of even trivial injuries. Being looked at immediately following a car accident could slow up the amount of pain experienced once the immediate trauma is over, in addition to reduce the burden of proof that a bodily injury was indeed the result of an accident.

2 comments:

  1. This notion really help us a lot to fully understand this matter and offer us great information on how we can avail a great service our business or other legal battles deserves.


    car accident lawyer chicago

    ReplyDelete
  2. Garrett, this information was very helpful! My cousin was recently in a car accident. Luckily, she wasn't hurt, if she had been, she may have needed to get an attorney. This sparked my interest and I decided I wanted to learn about ow an attorney could help in claiming injury from a car crash. I am glad I found this article, it is better to be safe than sorry and I may need this information one day!
    Emily Smith | http://www.scottandscottlaw.com/practiceareas.asp

    ReplyDelete